Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston spent the past week on college
football’s postseason awards circuit, cycling through banquets and red
carpets and trophy presentations. That culminated Saturday in Manhattan,
where Winston won the Heisman Trophy, his sport’s pre-eminent honor.
- Back to Home »
- Winston Earns Heisman in a Runaway
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Julio Cortez/Associated Press
By GREG BISHOP
Published: December 14, 2013
Wherever Winston traveled, an accusation of rape clouded the
celebration. Florida officials said this month that Winston would not be
charged in the year-old case. But as the Seminoles wrapped up an
undefeated season and their spot in the Bowl Championship Series title
game, scrutiny of the investigation only intensified.
Last December, a college student accused Winston of rape after a party.
The accuser’s lawyer came forward a year later to say that the
Tallahassee Police Department had pushed her not to press charges, and
the lawyer held a news conference Friday to skewer the investigation.
Winston’s lawyer has said that Winston and the accuser engaged in
consensual sex.
Winston wrapped his arms around the Heisman Trophy late Saturday, after
an hourlong television special in which the only suspense centered on
how much he would win by. The assembled cheered loudly, and Winston
hugged his parents and thanked God.
At his news conference, Winston said that he had expected to win but
that doubt had remained until he heard his name called. Someone asked
about the vindication he had spoken of earlier in the week.
“I really don’t want to talk about that right now,” Winston said,
“because this is a moment I’ll cherish for the rest of my life.”
All the off-field scrutiny appeared to have had a minimal impact on the
actual vote, although 13 percent of the 928 voters left Winston off
their ballots. He received 668 first-place votes and secured 2,205
points, 1,501 more than A J McCarron, the Alabama quarterback who came
in second. It was the seventh-largest victory margin in Heisman history.
The accusation played a minor role in Saturday’s proceedings and a
larger one in the lead-up to them. On Friday, Winston settled in front
of a bank of television cameras at a pre-Heisman news conference. His
lawyer stood behind him, as did university officials. While Winston
smiled and answered questions, they watched, with arms folded. While
Winston sidestepped questions about the investigation like wayward
defenders, the officials scolded reporters for broaching the subject.
It made for an awkward dance. At one point, after three questions
related to the accusations, Kerwin Lonzo, a Florida State sports
information official, told reporters that Winston would answer only
questions about football and the Heisman. A reporter asked whether
character should be considered in the selection of the winner, and Lonzo
snapped: “Next question. Only football.”
While the five other finalists switched tables during the interview
session, Florida State officials whisked Winston down the nearest
hallway. He eventually returned. They chalked up the missed time to
confusion.
At the second table, someone asked Winston if he wanted to tell his side
of the story. It was among the first direct questions he had taken
since the accusation surfaced.
“I knew I did nothing wrong,” he said. “That’s why I knew that I could
respect the process and I’d eventually be vindicated. It was more about
me being silent for my family, because I didn’t want to put my family in
those situations.”
So it went for Winston, who set freshman records this season in the
Football Bowl Subdivision, the highest level of college football, for
touchdown passes (38) and passing yards (3,820). Florida State won each
of its 13 games by double-digit margins. The Seminoles will play Auburn
on Jan. 6 in Pasadena, Calif., for the national championship.
That was no longer the sole focus this season. Winston and Florida State
tried to move on after Dec. 5, when a Florida state attorney, William
N. Meggs, held a news conference to say Winston would not be charged.
Meggs said the accuser had given inconsistent statements. He said he did
not have enough evidence to go to trial.